“I showed two new volunteers how to use the registration sheet” is a useful cover-letter fact. It describes an action and gives a concrete example of helping other people learn a process.
An AI draft might expand that into “I trained two volunteers to work independently and improved registration accuracy.” In this illustrative example, the added outcomes have no support. They sound like the natural result of the task, which is precisely why they need a careful review.
Rephrasing has a factual boundary
The first sentence can support a claim that the applicant explained a registration process to two volunteers. It does not establish a formal training role, later independence, confidence or fewer errors. Those results might be true, but the source does not say so.
A cover letter can still make a useful connection to a job that involves explaining procedures. For example:
Showing two new volunteers how to use the registration sheet gave me relevant experience explaining a process to others.
Even here, the applicant should be comfortable with the interpretation. “Relevant” is a judgment to explain in the application, rather than an achievement someone measured.
The Cover Letter Generator uses supplied experience and a job description to draft the letter. It includes Source evidence and Facts to confirm. Review those alongside the letter itself; an exact source excerpt can point to the action without justifying an invented result.
Length does not create more experience
The target word count ranges from 150 to 400, with some allowed variation. A longer target does not make sparse experience support more claims. If the input contains one short task, the letter may need a shorter focus or more genuine context from the applicant.
Useful additions could explain why the role interests you, which responsibility connects to the example or what you hope to learn. Keep these statements clearly about your motivation or future contribution. Do not disguise a future aspiration as something you already achieved.
An applicant who wants to mention accuracy should first ask whether there is a real result to describe. Did they observe a corrected error, or keep a record of a change? If the answer is no, leave that outcome out. A metric is not compulsory for a truthful account.
Check what you would need to explain aloud
Imagine an interviewer asking, “How did you know they could work independently?” If the only answer is that the draft inferred it, remove the claim. Apply the same question to leadership, efficiency and any other quality the letter attributes to you.
Check the role title and employer details separately, since the tool does not fetch or verify an advert. Remove private contact details or confidential work information before sending material to the site's configured AI providers.
The final letter should make a clear connection from real experience to the proposed role. Keep the source account with the approved draft so you can explain every past-tense claim without relying on wording the generator added.